Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Thomas (rugby league)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Thomas (rugby league)[edit]

This person is semi-professional and doesn't play for a national side. There was a prod and I thought I'd take it to an AfD as he's at the top level of rugby league in the US. There has been some debate on one of his fellow players (who plays at an international level). JASpencer (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete not-notable. Jim62sch^dissera! 23:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The other article I mentioned was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Kosbob. JASpencer (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —Sting au Buzz Me... 12:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable athlete playing in National League. That's top level so satisfies WP:BIO criteria for athletes. No need to play International. Does a premier league Gridiron player need to play International? Sting au Buzz Me... 12:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the WP:BIO criteria asks for fully proffesional players, not semi-proffesional. Secretalt (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has played in the top level of the sport in the United States. Professional or semi-professional is not relevant here. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.