Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Cutler (bodybuilder)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 04:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Cutler (bodybuilder)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete. Lack of gng sources. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and trout the nominator. Cutler is a four-time Mr. Olympia winner and one of the most successful bodybuilding competitors of all times. Yes, sourcing is poor, but this is common for all bodybuilding bios on this wiki (except for those who excelled in other fields like acting/politics/business). Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As a 4x Mr. Olympia winner he's notable. Cllgbksr (talk) 06:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Documented as a four-time Mr. Olympia , he's notable. Alansohn (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep I don't care for this "sport" with its rampant steroid use, but it remains a popular one and he is the winner of its biggest accolades. Powermugu (talk) 17:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep subject clearly passes GNG. Lepricavark (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.