Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Jay Connor

Jay Connor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG the only GHIT news articles I could find came from his own IPTV station Domdeparis (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - Found 3x RS articles - This and, This here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonp70 (talk • contribs)

References

• Delete - Subject lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable businessperson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

• keep I have researched him further and found a handful of independent articles - Romford Recorder, Barking And Dagenham Post and Braintree and Witham Times, I live in South London and all these 3 are substantial local papers that I have heard off and to be fair Essex TV is quite a strong brand locally and Jay being the brains behind the operation makes sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.140.172 (talk) 01:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Having also lived in London, I haven't heard of these newspapers because they're local and concentrated in small areas of East London (and Essex in the case of the latter). Sources need to be reliable and there needs to be a great deal of them. st170e^talk 00:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Razr Nation 06:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete sources need to be independent of the subject and reliable. Clearly doesn't meet notability guidelines. st170e^talk 00:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - I have not finding enough for WP:GNG--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.