Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JayFrance production discography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to JayFrance#Discography. Duplicate. Redirection to existing sections/articles is preferred to AFD in such circumstances, and should at least be attempted first. postdlf (talk) 15:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JayFrance production discography[edit]

JayFrance production discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simple duplication of JayFrance#Discography

Given that article (created a day ago) is wearing an unref tag dated from July, I also wonder if that article is a new recreation of an old deleted article? Andy Dingley (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created for adding non-single music production discographies from past and or future references. MikeJamesz

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as any necessary information is best at the first article. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not enough significance currently to warrant its own article. The appropriate place is on the artist's page, where it is already included. Onel5969 TT me 13:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.