Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jawbreaker (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jawbreaker (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low quality, non-notable fictional character stub; no sources and no significant coverage to be found. Prod was contested; I can't see why, since there are no WP:RS, and no assertion in the article that it meets even the minimum standards of WP:GNG. — Chromancer ^talk/_cont 01:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of real-world notability, no reliable sources cited. I also fail to see why the prod was declined. J Milburn (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Maximals. Mathewignash (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Really doesn't deserve an article. I don't think a redirect is necessary either. NotARealWord (talk) 18:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - based on the above {{find}} search, there doesn't appear to be significant coverage in reliable sources. The mention on the Jawbreaker disambiguation page could still be retained though. PhilKnight (talk) 23:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable sources, no real-world notability to be had. Tarc (talk) 18:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has nothing more than a profile in a comic book series. This is not enough to be merged or redirected to a character list. —Farix (t | c) 00:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.