Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Ideami (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Ideami[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, the subject is not notable. On Google or Google News I cannot find any substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. The article was written by Ideami himself and reads as self-promotion. The previous AfD was withdrawn (for what are to me unclear reasons) and did not actually establish notability here. GooseUser (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GooseUser (talk) 08:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.--Nahal^(T) 11:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.--Nahal^(T) 11:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the page is promotional. I cannot find good sources in a search.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 10:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is a self-promotional article (the subject deleted their admission of this on the talk page). Does not meet notability criteria. I searched on Google Books (subject has a self-published primary source book which does not count); nothing on JSTOR, NYT, Google Scholar, etc. The exhibitions and festivals and awards are not notable or come up 404. The "companion" article Ideami seems to be a mirror of this one, and perhaps should also be nominated for deletion. There are no notable museum shows, museum collections, in-depth reviews, etc. Netherzone (talk) 15:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity article, failing basic criteria for BLP notability, with no significant coverage in reliable sources. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable photographer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this promotion. Probably written by himself. (No surprise—it was.) Trillfendi (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.