Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatt Romantic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jatt Romantic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, also regional indian film of Punjabi language. lack of third party independent sources. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can be moved as draft. No references used. Only an external link (that too also a facebook link) used. Dwain09877 (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Argument of being "regional indian film of Punjabi language" has no bearing on film's notability, unless you are suggesting that Punjabi-language sources may exist. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. In no way meets WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO - Kolma8 (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of this passing WP:NFILM; no prejudice against this being worked on in draft if someone is convinced that sources do exist Spiderone 08:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.