Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatibarang Brebes Sugar Mill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jatibarang Brebes Sugar Mill[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage and the article is unreferenced. The Indonesian Wikipedia article is very long, but unreferenced. SL93 (talk) 23:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Indonesia. SL93 (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the correlated 'nearby' information in items such as Banjaratma_Heritage_Rest_Area gives a good idea of what can be done with former sugar factory information into current conditions - also Lucas's fieldwork was nearby as well which would provide background. The last paragraph of the article is ethnographically interesting, most of the historical information would be best in the Jatibarang article. However to the unititiated there are more than one jatibarang in java - there is one in Brebes, and another in Semarang, no doubt others as well. JarrahTree 01:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.