Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Tanamor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 05:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Tanamor[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides being non-notable, the page also looks more like an advertisement than an actual encycopledic entry. Statements like “will appeal to Twilight fans” are clear evidences of these. I considered editing the page, but a large percentage of it just advertisement. Bulls123 (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Philippines, and Oregon. Shellwood (talk) 09:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT. It's possible that the subject is notable, although I'm still unsure, the the article needs to be re-written entirely if that is the case. The reliable sources appear to be hyper-local to his hometown of Rock Island, Illinois and along the lines of "local man writes book". Other refs include Wordpress sites, at least one deadlink, and other unreliable sources. Best, GPL93 (talk) 11:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.