Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Michas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Michas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a thorough WP:BEFORE search, all I've been able to find are entries in various Wiki-type sites, an IMDB entry and other sites based purely on user-generated content. I was expecting to see at least one news mention - after all, this article is many years old - but no, there's nothing. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 20:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 20:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 20:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability requirements for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Actors are not handed an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because roles are listed in the article — having acting roles is the job description, not "inherent" notability in and of itself. It's not the list of roles that makes an actor includable in and of itself, but the depth of reliable source coverage about him in media that can be shown to get him over WP:GNG for having had roles. But there are no proper references being cited here at all, and I'm having about as much luck as the nominator at finding anything better. Bearcat (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.