Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Genova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Genova[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

prod was declined, this gentleman may well exist, but he doesn't seem notable to me Ϣere SpielChequers 11:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was one of the original prodders, with this rationale: "I am unable to find significant discussion of the subject in multiple reliable sources. Google search results in lots of forum discussion of his videos, but nothing that meets WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE." "Quite the online following" is sort of a meaningless description, and not in itself one of the conditions of notability. Apparently this guy did some bodybuilding videos, and other guys are making fun of him for it. This article appears to be an extension of the trollery. ... discospinster _talk 14:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. The "references" are all to user-generated content, nothing even close to reliable. It's also worth noting that everything he's listed as winning is redlinked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, concur with above opinions Utterly does not meet WP:GNG. ~~Was dePRODed by one of the many anons who use the article as a play ground.~~ that was not correct(Sort through the dif's, especially prior to and just after my edits to full savor the true flavor.) The only contest win was for a local gym. Once you realize the non notable nature of the contest win, you may feel an urge to CSD. It was originally tagged as a hoax, but the subject is real. Dloh cierekim 22:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. concur. Student7 (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.