Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Danino-Holt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While I understand the nominator's concerns, the debate here is what to qualify as significant coverage. The consensus here is that the sources, including the one about the subject being the youngest presenter on MTV ever, to be significant enough. WP:N does not specify significance in detail, so there is a grey area in which it is open to debate whether or not coverage is significant. Here consensus is to regard the sources as significant enough, resulting in a keep-close. Regards So Why 11:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Danino-Holt[edit]

Doesn't seem to pass notability. Book search turns up nothing, news search only turns up a couple hits, all of which are mentions in passing, not "significant coverage". And even a web search only turns up 102 hits, many of which are WP copies. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A Google search returns many results, including ones from reliable sources. Same for a Hebrew search. -- Nudve (talk) 12:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources already cited are sufficient to meet the usual inclusion criterion. This does not appear to be an exceptional case. Wily D 13:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - several sources already establish notability, and few Google hits don't automatically make someone non-notable. Moreover, he's a reasonably well-known TV presenter in Israel. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 15:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just want to point out that none of the sources mentioned here, and even in the article, and even in the Google searches - none of them actually satisfy Notability. They are not "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". The esctoday.com link is barely a paragraph, the mtv.tv article is four short paragraphs, and the ynetnews comes close to actually being a significant source. To whoever closes this AfD, note that so far the !votes haven't had any weight behind them and don't actually address the issue, which is that Danino-Holt fails WP:N. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.