Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason B. Cope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jason B. Cope[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

SPA-created article, highly promotional; sources are entirely written by the subject, or primary stuff like association directories – nothing about the subject at all that isn't self-published. Googles shows nothing but the usual advertising, LinkedIn, whatever. E Eng 20:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nomination sums it up. Promotional article where the sourcing does not pass the GNG because it is either promotional, primary, or self-authored. The clear promotional nature of the article also fails WP:NOTSPAM, making this article fail both points of WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 1500 cites on GS not enough for a highly cited field (one of the entries is bogus). Xxanthippe (talk) 10:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.