Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarmo Viteli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jarmo Viteli[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined in 2010 (courtesy @Abductive and Cnilep: when notability guidelines were rather different. A BEFORE shows no evidence since that he passes WP:ACADEMIC. He has published, but doesn't appear well-cited enough to meet WP:ACADEMIC and appears to be co-author on some of the more highly cited ones. I can find no evidence in English, Finnish or the Finnish article about him that would indicate he meets GNG or other criteria. Star Mississippi 15:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't know this scholar's work and can't argue confidently for their notability, but I do see many (50+) papers on Google Scholar by an author "J Viteli". Many of them are written in Finnish and none seem to be in my field of specialty, so I don't know and can't ascertain the reliability of the publications. Cnilep (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Having many publications is not enough for notability, whether we are going by WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:PROF. For all of these, in different ways, it is the impact of those publications that we must assess. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete 45 publications with 29 citations as per MA is not impressive and does not pass the bar for WP:NPROF#1, no other information in the article indicates any notability. Also clear COI with the article talking about him as a reviewer for EU projects, this is clearly written by someone close to the subject. --hroest 18:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citations too low for WP:PROF#C1, no other notability criterion evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.