Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Knabenbauer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Knabenbauer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. Article's creator noted when declining the PROD that "it is next to impossible to provide more third-party sources" meaning that I'm not alone in not being able to find any third-party sources. There's not a single third-party reliable source that is independent of the subject in the article. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Aoidh (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the real need for third party sources when all sources included are Verified/Legitimate information? Jared Knabenbauer is a highly recognized Internet personality. I believe he deserves to have a place on "The Free Encyclopedia". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny Tempest (talk • contribs) 19:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:N for a detailed answer, WP:WHYN specifically. Wikipedia is not a not a collection of indiscriminate information, third-party sources show that the content is notable and that there should be an article on the topic. - Aoidh (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all for any applicable notability, article not convincing at all. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) An extended mention in GameRevolution and a YouTube licensing controversy, but otherwise only passing mentions in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 08:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.