Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaratkaru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SK1 — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jaratkaru[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have proper reference for last two paragraphAjnabh (talk) 05:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don’t think I understand this nomination. There seem to be plenty of sources cited, including for the final paragraphs. Mccapra (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Why though? There are plenty of reliable sources, and there doesn't seem to be any sourcing problems for the last 2 paragraphs. GN-z11 ^☎ ^★ 15:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but restore Draft:Jaratkaru, which has the history of the article. Sourcing is fine. Nominator needs more experience and should please refrain from nominating articles for AfD. Vexations (talk) 21:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.