Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaraka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 12:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Jaraka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jaraka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG — Amkgp 💬 20:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp 💬 20:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp 💬 20:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Recognised settlements are always notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

This page has no problem, all the details provided are correct and this page is a well known place. So this article can't be deleted.

AjayDal — Preceding undated comment added 09:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC) — AjayDal (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Hello Everyone,

There are many places which don't have any trivial mention but they do exist. This doesn't justify the deletion of the article. There are many places which are much lesser known but they are on wikipedia. As Necrothesp mentioned, recognised places are always notable. And I know that the article had some missing info about its location and I have provided sufficient info about it. If the article needs some more improvement, please let me know.

Thank you SambitK (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GEOLAND #1. As well as the census returns referenced in the article, searches find news coverage such as this (2013), this (2017), passing location mention (2020), passing location mention (2021). AllyD (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GNG too as it complies with General Notability Guidelines as the town has significant news coverage.

Thank you

SambitK (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND per above editors, also this article shows there is a Gokarneshwar (Lord Shiva) temple there. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.