Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese people who conserve Article 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Article is on main page. Please renominate once it has been taken down. (See section 6 of Wikipedia:Speedy keep) (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese people who conserve Article 9[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not meet the notability guidelines for events. The article talks about people, but is really about the nomination event; this event has no discernable impact, does not have wide geographic impact (because the lack of winning barely impacts anyone beyond who signed), and has not received major coverage nor is its coverage likely to be lasting. People who are not awarded a Nobel Prize can hardly be said to be notable based on that fact alone. At best, this very loose movement merits a sentence or two on the Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution article or at 2014 Nobel Peace Prize. See also, WP:NOTNEWS. Knight of Truth (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that this is, as I write, on the main page in the Do You Know section. As a rule DYK articles are all supposed to be vetted to check if they pass basic Wikipedia policies per WP:WIADYK. Michitaro (talk) 02:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.