Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janusz Cedro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Janusz Cedro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any sources to verify any of this information. All the search results I could find are about another Janusz Cedro who is a museum curator. I checked the Polish version to see if there are some sources there we could use, but it is also completely unsourced. Brad v 17:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tried to prod it in December 2016, but the filing editor removed it with a promise to add references, that never happened. Failed WP:BIO and WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There appear to be a number of sources in Polish that I can see in a search - [1][2][3], so it's not quite true that there no sources. Hzh (talk) 01:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added some of the references found, so it should satisfy WP:GNG. Considering that he was most active pre-internet age, and the sources in Polish may not have been archived for easy access on the internet, that there is still coverage of the person suggests that he is notable. Hzh (talk) 10:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Of the four Polish-language sources added to the article, [4] is an interview, [5] is a corporate bio, possibly self-published, [6] only mentions the subject in passing, and [7] is an announcement from a municipal website. Where is the significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy GNG? Brad v🍁 16:34, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I really tried to scrape for a solid source to provide this article, as it is decently written and some good work has gone into all the media attached to the page. However, with all that said I just could not find any significant source that would satisfy WP:GNG on this article. Maybe someone better qualified to look over Polish sources could rescue the article, but until then I have to agree with Bradv's nom. DeniedClub ^{❯❯❯ talk?} 09:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.