Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet. Tour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Doc ask? 15:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Janet. Tour[edit]
Delete - info on a specific musician's tour does not really need its own page. Wickethewok 00:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, apparently the article was started due wikilinks to four tours in Janet Jackson page (Rhythm Nation 1814 Tour, janet. Tour, The Velvet Rope Tour and All for You Tour. I believe it would be wise to merge all these tours into a single list, although I am not sure if there can be such lists in Wikipedia (or if any other musician has one). -- ReyBrujo 04:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The administrators wanted to delete the article stating that writing specific information for a musician's tour doesn't need its own page. I find it to be unfair. There are other musicians's tours that has each of their own pages for example, Madonna. I don't see the reason why the article should be considered for deletion. All the information about the article is completed and accurate. I see other musicians that has a page for their own tours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucy2006 (talk • contribs)
- Keep. Some tours can have interesting information, and Janet Jackson's tours certainly reach that standard. Certainly, not every tour by every band is worth an article, but some are. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 01:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Major tour by a major artist, seen by millions of people. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine - if there is precedent, I withdraw the nom, though I disagree with it. Wickethewok 08:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 10:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.