Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Mendillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Mendillo[edit]

I originally tagged this as prod, but was questioned on it by the article's creator. It strikes me as being non-notable biography Cnwb 05:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article's creator here. The biography's subject is chief investment officer at Wellesley, manages university's US$1.25 billion endowment fund. Subject also managed US$7 billion at Harvard. Full name search gets approximately 275 hits on Google. I read WP:BIO but it's not clear to me where notable/non-notable cut-off should be. JDMBAHopeful 05:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete having an impressive resume does not necessarily make someone notable. No hits on google scholar or book searches -- Astrokey44|talk 13:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I concur with Astrokey44; good resume does not equate to notability.--Isotope23 17:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until the cheif investment officer of my alma mater (a school of greater size and endowment) has his own page, neither does she.--Dinosaurdarrell 20:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.