Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Borghesi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Borghesi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable actor who has garnered no significant coverage. She's had minor parts in a few TV shows, a couple of films and some stage plays. The article has been tagged as poorly-sourced for nearly a decade: the only footnote is to an article from 14 years ago mentioning her connection with another performer, and this fails WP:NOTINHERITED ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep It is very easy to find plenty of minor references to the subject refering to the subject's acting roles across genre. There are also references available for her writing. While there is sufficient to reference most if not all of the claims in the current article, from what I found it would be difficult to go much beyond that, ie no real in-depth. However, there is more than just proving EXISTS. Aoziwe (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we should not be keeping actresses on a bunch of minor references. There are not significant roles in notable productions. Lots of small roles do not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: I don't think the actress quite meet the notability standards. Dflaw4 (talk) 08:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.