Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janam Janam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dilwale (2015 film). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 09:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janam Janam[edit]

Janam Janam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not have WP:SIGCOV by reliable and independent sources. Other reliable sources mention the song passingly while discussing about the film it is from, or the actors/singers. Fails WP:GNG. Passes WP:MILL though. This song can be discussed appropriately in the article of the film it is from. —usernamekiran(talk) 03:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Administrators please take a note of this user @Usernamekiran:, this user is stalking me as well as my contributions, most of my articles to are well sourced and have many coverages, but still this guy is placing deletion tags. The users article creation log shows he have created less than 5 articles ,the user is not involved in content creation ,but tries to delete others creation. Anoptimistix (talk) 03:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anoptimistix: I think your previous comment better fits in WP:ANI. usernamekiran(talk) 03:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Done. Added independent coverage of the song by reputed and reliable Indian news Media Indian Express.Now I think it qualifies notability criteria of the song as it has an independent coverage Anoptimistix (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:48, 7 July 2017(UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.