Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Graczyk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep — Caknuck 00:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Jan Graczyk

Jan Graczyk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

1. No original research.
2. Fails criteria of creative professionals notability (see WP:BIO\Criteria for notability of people):
   1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors: no
   2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique: no
   3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews:
      no, it has been mentioned Polish and foreign media presented Jan Graczyk`s sculptures but no source are given
   4. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries, museums or internationally significant libraries:
      (a:) no (b:) had some individual exhibitions but there is no assertion for significance, notability and/or media coverage in the article (c:) no (d:) According to the article: The artist`s works can be found in private and national art collections (...), but no sources and no assertion for significance of these art collections were given. Visor (talk · contribs) 21:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Okay, I don't read Polish, so you can research this better than me, but common sense says this guy is notable, given the medals he has earned, the length of his career and the widespread galleries that display his work. Mark the article with verify if you want, and there could be a bit less editorializing in the text, but this does not at all appear to fall under WP:NN. Capmango 21:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Campnango. I don't get the part about original research-- did the author snap the photos? "Original research" is overused, and because it's not consistently applied, an argument that's no longer taken seriously. I'm not sure how else one writes an article about the latest episode of "Ghost Whisperer" (citation to the Journal of Ghost Whisperer Studies? Don't think so...). In this case, it's clear that the author translated the Polish article and added some other information not contained therein. Like Cap, I don't read Polish either, so I'm not going to be grouczy about an article about Graczyk. Mandsford 22:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. He was a very well-known and well-regarded Polish artist, on the level of Henry Moore in the UK. A verify tag would be appropriate, but it's easily attributable and, because he's dead, the extra stringency of WP:BLP does not apply. --Charlene 22:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - notable article as per Galeria Ad-Hoc - an art gallery listed by

Official page of Warsaw]. Add links i.e. for "Warsaw uprising 1944" and the above reference regarding "Ad-Hoc" Gallery". greg park avenue 15:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.