Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan-Paul Brekke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No agreement that the notability requirements are not met. Sandstein 09:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jan-Paul Brekke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:PROF. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Apparently an expert on immigration to scandinavian countries, based on the long lists of publications in Norwegian and English. Most of them appear to be articles of long reports, rather than books, so this is only a weak keep. But the noWP has an article, and I give considerable deference to their ability to judge the notability of Norwegian researchers, which I think likely to be better than ours., and I think their notability standard in general at least as high as that of the enWP. DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment no:wp's notability inclusion criteria, particularly for biographies, is considerably lower than en:wp. Arsenikk ^(talk) 09:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, main notability is as a TV figure I think. Geschichte (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or delete. Notability as a scholar has not been adequately documented by independent sources. His stature as a minor television celebrity is also tenuous as a reason for keeping this article. __meco (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - He probably fails WP:PROF, but I guess he passes as a TV-figure. Article needs a overhaul though. Would be a shame if the article was kept, and then noone cared to do anything about the article, leaving the article as it is now. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a new search in Atekst (printed newspaper database) shows 289 hits. For instance, Klassekampen on 29 January 2011 had a two-page article which discusses a report he has co-published in lieu of Norway's immigration politics. Arsenikk ^(talk) 09:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.