Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Smart (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non admin closure) Valoem ^talk ^contrib 04:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Smart (author)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant contribution, BLP. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep His book Clarity has coverage in the FT[1], London Times[2], a book from reputable publisher SAGE[3], and there's other sources listed (which may be briefer mentions). That puts either him or Clarity over the bar for WP:AUTHOR or WP:BKCRIT. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only book review I see is the one listed above from the Financial Times. The London Times article is in the food section, and uses his books suggestion of "tea time" at work for a discussion of tea. The Telegraph link [4] mentions that a footballer walked into the stadium carrying Smart's book. That's a mention. And I couldn't find anything at all at the Washington Times (link is broken and a search didn't turn anything up). One review and a reputable publisher is a start, but not notability. LaMona (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.