Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Proctor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Proctor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable footballer who has not competed in a fully professional match so fails WP:ATHLETE. Also fails general notability guidelines due to lack of significant coverage. -- Big Dom 20:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It pains me to say this (being a Preston supporter),but he's yet to even warm up our bench, so he fails Wp:ATHLETE, andalso fails Wp:GNG as well. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 21:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. He fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. It looks to like someone just trying to save a pet article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Youth/reserve player not yet made it to first team for matchday. Fails ATHLETE, only club profile and routine coverage as any local sports person gets. --ClubOranje^T 08:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.