Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Leigh Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator failed to advance an argument for deletion and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Leigh Jones[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am creating this AfD on behalf of Truthwillsetyoufree123, who appears to be the subject of this article that is also requesting some properly sourced information be removed.

"Please delete page unless you will add in the unbiased information as added on the talk page. Also, the portion on Victor Scarano is not something that can be used on this wikipedia. Please see evidence on talk page. Furthermore, the EEOC did not say what the page says that it determined. The determination letter was also posted.

Please revert changes to reflect accuracy as represented by myself or delete immediately." jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) (for Truthwillsetyoufree123) 17:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This is not a deletion rationale. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Significant news coverage from reliable sources. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete:

The article is a biography of a living person, and the material is potentially harmful; The neutrality of the material is in question; One or more external links are in question; It is all based on nepotism on behalf of KBR Articles are misquoted to favor KBR It is highly biased against Jamie Leigh Jones — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthwillsetyoufree123 (talk • contribs) — Truthwillsetyoufree123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

~~Speedy Delete~~ this is NOT a biography. It is a biased article against Jamie Leigh Jones. This article is prejudice in favor of KBR. Please delete immediately. You can add whatever you want in favor of KBR on KBR's wikipedia page but not on a "biography" of a living person. This biography doesn't include anything in favor of Jamie Leigh Jones and she did do a significant amount of positive things in her life. It must be removed. Truthwillsetyoufree123 (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC) — Truthwillsetyoufree123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Strike bolded Speedy Delete, you can make all the comments you want but you only get to give your recommendation once. ~ GB fan 02:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.