Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Hutchinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Hutchinson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious notability; current version of the article is not in WP:NPOV. Zzarch (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Dubious notability, essentially unsourced, I've removed a great deal of inappropriate BLP material. Acroterion (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find enough reliable, independant sources to confer notability, outside of the fact that the article is very poorly written. Angryapathy (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete I had also deleted a bunch of the BLP vio and it was restored by the creator. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Of the remaining references, IMDB is unreliable as anyone can edit it. The Tiger Lily Films reference doesn't mention him. Google returns multiple Jamie Hutchinsons, none of which appear to be this. I can't honestly see how anyone can get enough reliable sources on this one. --Ritchie333 (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above, not enough reliable sources at this time. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.