Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Adenuga (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Icestorm815 • Talk 21:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Adenuga[edit]

~~A completely unreferenced article about a living person is a WP:BLP violation since the information within it cannot be verified.~~ I have been unable to find any suitable reliable sources on which to base the article. It seems unlikely that the topic of the article is notable, there is no evidence of siginicant coverage by reliable sources, independent of the subject or that the they meet any of the criteria set out in WP:MUSIC. Guest9999 (talk) 21:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable Dreamspy (talk) 21:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing here suggests passage of WP:MUSIC and there is no attribution of notability to independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 22:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This was linked to in the original AfD discussion. Corvus cornix_talk 22:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the reference to the article, although I don't think that two paragraphs constitutes the significant coverage by reliable, independent sources required to establish notability by WP:NN or the specific requirements listed in WP:MUSIC. Guest9999 (talk) 23:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment - I deleted all peacocking from the article. Very little content left, nothing properly sourced. But I'll withhold my opinion as I've no clue about the genre. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.