Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Nadwiyya Edavanna (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Nadwiyya Edavanna[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Islamic seminary. Kutyava (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. University-level institutions are usually considered notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- How the University-level says about the Islamist seminary. Kutyava (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep No apparent justification given for listing as terrorism related (I’m only here because I follow that category), neither the university page or the page of its founding party contain any mention of terrorism. That tag was added by the nominator and is the first tag so unless they have a really good explanation I think we have an inappropriate use of AfD to push a personal agenda. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I tend to agree with this. It does look rather bad. I am rather puzzled why the nom added Terrorism, but not Islam, which is an obvious delsort category. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Everything smells bad, as Eastmain noted "University-level institutions are usually considered notable” as for the first deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Nadwiyya Edavanna there literally wasn’t one, not a single comment and the nominator is a blocked sock of a banned user. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 14:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I have included the discussion on the list of terrorism because the seminary is run by an Islamist organization based in Kerala. Kutyava (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not a valid reason, Islamist =/= Terrorist or even anything close. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and therefore WP:GNG. I could find no sources on this institution in the English langauge. Perhaps there are foreign language references, but until they are produced, the assumption is they do not exist.4meter4 (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .--SalmanZ (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV; nothing else apart from a couple of trivial name-drops as to Jamia Beevdi. Both in English media as well as vernacular. ∯WBG^converse 17:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.