Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Islamia Faiz-e-Aam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Islamia Faiz-e-Aam[edit]

Jamia Islamia Faiz-e-Aam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only notability is that the Madrasa has been approved by the UP Madrasa Board of Education and nothing else. Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Approval and recognition of this university by the Education Board of one of the largest Indian states (Uttar Pradesh in this case) should not be taken lightly and made fun of? The Deletion nominator may or may not like this article? We are supposed to show tolerance and respect for all faiths and their different sects per Wikipedia policy. Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ngrewal1:Which university? Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 08:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The word 'Jamia' in the above article title in Arabic language means 'University' as we all know. Technical questions like this, I'm sure were observed by the Uttar Pradesh Education Board before they gave their approval to this institution. This article obviously needs improvement which anyone of us can attempt to do. This Discussion Forum is NOT FOR CLEANUP - WP:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP. Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See the full list of board-approved madrassas, schools and colleges in 2015. Do you think all institutions are eligible to be included here? Sabeelul hidaya (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am against erasing this page with the motives of maslak conflict. Of course, it is desirable to enrich the source of this page. Deleting the page violates the following two policies:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary 2.Dictionary entries.[1] Encyclopedia articles are about a person, or a group, a concept, a place, a thing, an event, etc. Wikipedia is not a battleground [2] Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear. Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals. DarulPak (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DarulPak,those are not the issues at hand here, unless you feel that this nomination has been made in bad faith. The relevant policy here is WP:N, which this clearly fails. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete coverage of this place seems to be extremely trivial and there's clearly some COI editing Etc. Etc. going on that shouldn't be support. Nor is it worth having an article on this if it will just be used as a promotional tool. I'm not a fan of people badgering the nominator either. That said, I'm mostly voting delete because of the lack of adequate sourcing. It should go without saying that the other nonsense people have brought up for this is notable do nothing in that regard. Notability isn't based on some rando's recognition. Especially an education board since that's literally what they exist for. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no notability apart from the fact it exists, and is recognised by the government. The list for educational institutes qualifying these parameters would be in the tens of thousands. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.