Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James river assembly

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James river assembly[edit]

This page is not acceptable as the church has no significance :: Colin Keigher 06:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Check edit history, the original nomination description was vandalised by the User:Macs417. This page should be watched carefully. Some guy 07:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- This page is not acceptable as the church has no significance. :: Colin Keigher 06:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Save- Links have been made to this article from other articles. Example: Andy Collins (radio). 01:04, April 17, 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Macs417 (talk • contribs) .
  • Comment - Looks like the submitter decided to remove the AfD off of the article :: Colin Keigher 06:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - Looks like the deletion suggestor decided to remove the article before a deletion vote was even possible and the submitter had to repost the entire article. Michael Smith 01:40, April 17, 2006—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Macs417 (talk • contribs) .
  • Delete. Um... What are you talking about? Nom has only one edit to the page, to put the AfD notice there. Anyway, I don't think this is notable enough. If it expands to becoming a nationwide thing, or a widely recognized megachurch, I'll reconsider. Grandmasterka 06:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Note from the logs: 03:27, April 17, 2006 Slendidlydelicious (New user (Talk | contribs | block))
—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 17:50, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, non-notable church. Don't see adequate substantiation of why it is important politically. -- Samir (the scope) 13:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, nn church. --Terence Ong 15:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, individual churches are not inherently notable.  RasputinAXP  c 20:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Rasputin. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete parishcruft. Fishhead64 02:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewrite and rename James River Assembly of God (Ozark). In its current (07:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)) form, it's just advertising and out-of-context trivia, and the church and "I Love America" seem to only have the location in common. But theoretically the article could establish notability, so I think it's too soon to delete. Peter Grey 07:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_river_assembly&oldid=1142209928"