Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James and Blackburn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
James and Blackburn[edit]
- James and Blackburn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined speedy, fails WP:BAND. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, A7, I don't see anything in here other than "unique for their style and dance moves while on stage" which is far too vague to count for anything. If not speedy, then simply delete for lack of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I didn't speedy this when I saw it, because it does contain a few reviews. But they seem to be purely local in scope, and didn't indicate any particular notability to me. My attempt to discuss that on the talk page was a dead end, which makes me suspect that the author understands that the band doesn't meet the criteria. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I had dropped a speedy tag on this, as it was lacking citations at the time. Still, even with citations, it seems to fail notability (fails criteria 1-12 as it stands right now). I can't confirm this, but I suspect there may also be a conflict of interest on the part of the author. My suspicion is based on this being the user's first page on Wikipedia, and the passion with which the author has defended the article seems to suggest the author may have a close affiliation with the subject of the article. It feels like the author is trying to get out information about their band with reckless disregard for Wikipedia's standards (also Commons standards regarding no copyright rationale on the picture).GnoworTalk2Medid wha? 17:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Could not find anything to support notability of band. ttonyb (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.