Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James With
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
James With[edit]
- James With (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I came upon this article when I reviewed an unblock request from a user who had been adding unsourced information to it. I tried to help the user, and in the process discovered that I wasn't able to find good sources to verify any of the information in the article. He appears to have acted only in very minor roles, and I'm not convinced that he meets Wikipedia's notabiity criteria. What do you think, Wikipedia community? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He's been in some notable films, but in at least one case it was an 'uncredited' part, and it seems likely that the others were minor or background roles so, in the absence of any decent coverage that I can find, I would suggest he fails on notability.--KorruskiTalk 11:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sign of multiple significant parts. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.