Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James White (theologian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James White (theologian)[edit]

James White (theologian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find SIGCOV in reliable sources during a BEFORE search. Huge amounts of blog content, especially on Patheos blogs, but nothing significant in actual RS, other than mentions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete. Non-notable and the only sources come from blogs/the church itself. ArdynOfTheAncients (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not a rationale for speedy deletion. Jclemens (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep James White is a theologian who was written multiple books and is a well known apologist, when I am home I may try to find more sources for the article. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I found multiple sources that talk about James White and added them to the article. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 12:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the Early Church to Our Modern Time is published by WestBow, a self publishing outfit.[1] WHY PROTESTANT BIBLES ARE SMALLER: A Defense of the Protestant Old Testament Canon is another independently published book from a self publishing outfit.[2] The Critique of Religion and Religion’s Critique: On Dialectical Religiology has a single sentence mention. This site is not independent, since he's a teacher there. Lastly you added this, which is sourced to a media ministry that serves Christ by explaining and defending the Catholic faith.
      We need significant coverage, independent of the article subject, in reliable sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      This recently added source is a self published source, and is by someone who was debating White. Not independent, doesn't establish notability. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This reference on a broad catholic site here should not be dismissed as it is independent critical analysis, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity Atlantic306 (talk) 23:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep. Ridiculous nomination which hasn't followed WP:BEFORE. Obviously, one must search carefully because it is a common name, but GS cites are very high for this field: 68, 59, 41, 36, 25, etc. StAnselm (talk) 23:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here is some coverage in news articles: [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. StAnselm (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for providing those sources, it's appreciated. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.