Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Wardlaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

James Wardlaw[edit]

James Wardlaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find enough in-depth coverage from reliable, secondary sources to show he passes WP:GNG, and he clearly does not meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 03:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This isn't clear from the article, but he's probably best known as a Melbourne theatre actor. I've personally seen him in lots of (professional) things over the last 20 years, in supporting roles mainly. At best a weak keep, but I'm reserving my vote for now to see if I can drum up other references. Boneymau (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete based on his very minimal screen roles. Google News turns up a half dozen mentions of his stage roles, but they don't push me over the top. If more substantial coverage is found of his stage career, let me know and I may change my opinion. SunChaser (talk) 16:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Only mentioned incidentally in relation to his stage roles. No independent significant coverage. Kb.au (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the film roles are clearly not enough to justify an article, and the mentioned stage roles seem even less likely to add up, since we would first need to identify him as having a role in a production that was notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.