Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Allen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
James W. Allen[edit]
- James W. Allen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person doesn't appear to meet the criteria for inclusion in WP:BIO and WP:WINEMAKER. Seems to have local coverage only. Competition seems to be a non-notable event with local entries rather than international. This seems like a memorial article; see the policy WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Prod was removed by the author without explanation. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE. The PROD clearly should have been respected, there's no attempt at meeting WP:BIO. tedder (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete possibly re-writeable as an article on the subjects vineyard. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless better sources are provided. I checked the links given. BE——Critical__Talk 03:56, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there seems to be nothing redeeming about this article. Copyvio of awful POV writing on an insufficiently notable subject. Unless actual decent sources appear there is no cause to keep. MURGH talk 21:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.