Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Palm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

James Palm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

James Palm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article with content substantially from SPA. No evidence of notability; grandiose claims of notability centre on founding a redlinked company, cited to questionable and non-RS boosterism sources. The bigger problem is zero RS coverage of any depth, and only press releases and light churnalism - once you've dug past all the other people called "James Palm" for what little material there is about this one, there's nothing that could substantiate any reasonable WP:BLP. I'd happily be demonstrated wrong, but it would need to be shown. David Gerard (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.