Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Maxwell (minister)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
James Maxwell (minister)[edit]
- James Maxwell (minister) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the biographical and general notability guidelines. Extremely limited coverage to be found on Google News, which includes a handful of mentions, usually as the presiding minister at funerals. The limited bio on the website of his school gives no indication of notability. -- Lear's Fool 06:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 06:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 06:18, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 06:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Could be a technical pass of WP:Prof#C6 depending on the status of the institution. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Unless some reliable sources can be provided to verify the content here, it should be deleted regardless. -- Lear's Fool 06:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The college website says clearly that he is the President. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- I suppose. Regardless, I think that criterion is more intended for people like Vice-Chancellors of major universities and the like. I don't think being president of a small (400 students) Bible college would qualify. -- Lear's Fool 07:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That is indeed the point. Does the college qualify as a major academic institution? Xxanthippe (talk) 07:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- I suppose. Regardless, I think that criterion is more intended for people like Vice-Chancellors of major universities and the like. I don't think being president of a small (400 students) Bible college would qualify. -- Lear's Fool 07:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The college website says clearly that he is the President. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Unless some reliable sources can be provided to verify the content here, it should be deleted regardless. -- Lear's Fool 06:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Though I'm not sure there is a formal policy, I don't think a small religious college (of any religion) can be considered a "major academic institution". For example, this particular school apparently has 30 faculty, which would be smaller than a single department at a research university. Therefore, I don't think that criterion WP:PROF #6 applies. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Agree with Agricola's assessment. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.