Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Marcinkowski (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2006#District 8. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Marcinkowski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marcinkowski is primarily noted for his political campaign which he lost. His attempts to press corruption charges and suit against his former boss at the Oakland County Prosecutors office are just not notable enough to generate an article. Getting someone convicted of a low level crime, even if they are a notorious criminal like Kevorkian, does not make someone notable. Marcinkowski's connections to Plame are also minor, and not enough to justify having an article on him. Basically the last keep may have made sense under the more lenient inclusion rules of Wikipedia in the middle of last decade, but I see no reason to keep this article under our current inclusion rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect to the election --180.172.239.231 (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sources discussing the subject are provided. There is one blog, one google search, and several links to front pages that do not reference the subject. The article attempts to tie to other notable subjects, but notability is not inherited.--Rpclod (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan, 2006#District 8. No evidence of notability. Tiller54 (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.