Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Barr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. alphaChimp^(talk) 01:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Barr[edit]

Non-notable biography article, fails WP:BIO. Only hint of notability in the article is his company. Searches on the company return nothing applicable: "James L. Barr Consulting": [1]
"James Barr Consulting": [2]
And, for what it's worth, the article appears to vanity. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 04:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:The article has a nice pic, but it's still a failure of WP:BIO. --Hetar 04:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - judging from the comment that the author placed on this page before the first deletion reason was placed, it's definitely vanity. I didn't see any indication that this gentleman met the bio guidelines before placing the notability tag on the page. To the author: please read the above guidelines, and the verifiability requirements, which give an indication of why the article has been nominated. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Encise 05:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Encise[reply]
Delete per nom. SM247^{My Talk} 06:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, vanity. BTLizard 09:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vain vanity in vain. Danny Lilithborne 18:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Yamaguchi先生 23:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.