Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Kall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, all the references are either one-line mentions or listings. There is no in-depth, non-trivial support for the individual reddogsix (talk) 03:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lots of passing mentions that don't add up to anything significant. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- not a resume hosting service. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - the Kentucky article about Georgie Boy! is more than passing, but I'd like to see more of that. Bearian (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.