Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Horncastle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Horncastle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this person is notable. Of the two sources on the article, one is clearly just a page full of search engine optimization terms, and the second is just a portal page for the content he's produced at The Guardian. The hits on his Google search are mostly just blogs that he has posted on, not independent coverage of himself as a person. Was PROD'd shortly after creation but PROD was contested because this is a new user's article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just someone doing their job. Not all journalists are notable. Fails WP:NBIO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 14:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 15:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of significant independent coverage. Fenix down (talk) 16:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.