Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bamford
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy keep Kotepho 03:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
James Bamford[edit]
I guess anyone who attacks the president automatically gets their own article?--IPO 01:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- delete obvious misuse of article space to promote minority fringe POV and paint it as fact--IPO 01:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Bad faith nomination from IPO against critics of 9/11 --TBC
??? ??? ??? 01:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC) - Keep - I agree with TBC. The subject of the article is notable. User:IPO is running some kind of campaign against 9/11 conspiracy theorists. - Richardcavell 02:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep as bad faith WP:DISRUPT nom. Clearly notable author by WP standards. Шизомби 02:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep the president of where? Dlyons493 Talk 02:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, bad-faith nom, nominator gives no justification for deletion in nomination. Seems to be one of a series of such nominations by this editor-
admins might possibly consider some kind of sanction for disruption if the user persists. Badgerpatrol 03:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Scratch that (not my vote, which stands)- today appears to be the nominator's first day as an editor. I have left a note on their talk page in an attempt to explain the process a bit better. Badgerpatrol 03:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.