Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamcracker (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamcracker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. There have been multiple attempts to find suitable sources that establish notability and a talk page discussion specifically on the subject of meeting the notability criteria. The contributor has removed the notability tag multiple times (or perhaps that is some single-minded IP editor who is not the contributor). It's my conclusion that this company does not meet WP:NCORP and I'm looking for community consensus. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I see press releases, but nothing that is independent coverage, or even explains what the company does. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Repeated insertion of copyvio material and edit warring over maintenance templates makes it impossible to construct a neutrral article even if it were notable, and there is precious little evidence of that. A textbook example of why companies should not write their own articles. SpinningSpark 18:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.