Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakub Petelewicz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Petelewicz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography written by WP:SPA User:Jakubulek (the subject himself?). Does not seem to pass WP:PROF. Article deleted two years ago from the highly inclusionist pl wikipedia (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2015:03:01:Jakub Petelewicz) where it was noted he does not hold a professor title nor a habilitation, which is the pl wiki sufficient claim for notability for academics. Our criteria are somewhat stricter, and I don't see how he is meeting them. Couldn't verify the claim "fellow at United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., and Yad Vashem Institute", through even if he was a fellow at them this is not likely sufficient for notability per PROF3. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete no independent sources which could hint at his notability, beyond biographic blurbs here and there. Academic record is not impressive either. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NACADEMIC. Scholars are usually authors of numerous articles in their field of study, nothing extraordinary. Journal editors are not inherently notable either (even if they are the editor of some prestigious journal like Nature, though in that case, someone selected for such a position would probably be notable for plenty of other reasons, as the current editor is). Preparing exhibitions in museums seems also pretty run of the mill. The Polish Center for Holocaust Research is not a "a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society". It is highly specialized, yes, and I assume it holds some prestige in it's own field of study, but that's pretty much it 198.84.253.202 (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC) [Copied from my earlier request at AfD talk] 198.84.253.202 (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per comments above, and the lack of WP:RS. The Times HE article is not admissible, as it contains a passing mention. Not sure what the biography aims to achieve? Nicnote^{say hello!}_contribs 16:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.