Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Paterson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Rlendog (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Paterson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 03:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep he was a part of the U20 canada team Jigglypuff 109 (talk) 23:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And that doesn't make him notable. Joeykai (talk) 03:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One, I'm afraid, of a number of spurious Keeps in the last week by this new editor. Upon what policy basis do you think he's notable? Ravenswing 04:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Career low minor-leaguer with no particular accomplishments. Fails both NHOCKEY and the GNG, doesn't meet any notability criteria. Ravenswing 04:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet GNG after a search and does not meet NHOCKEY either. -DJSasso (talk) 11:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.