Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Eisenhart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Wizardman 17:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jake Eisenhart[edit]
- Jake Eisenhart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject played one third of one inning in one game in the major league. Not notable beyond that simple fact. The fact that he relieved Joe Nuxhall is not significant. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 03:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All that is true, and yet he passes WP:Athlete. I don't want to WP:IAR for this one, but I understand if others do. Vickser (talk) 04:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep he passes WP:ATHLETE. Blackngold29 06:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. He passes WP:ATHLETE, because he's competed at the highest professional level (old wording) in a fully professional league (new wording). One appearance is sufficient.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Major League is accepted as the highest level, even that short period is notable. —Borgardetalk 15:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep passes athlete (per aboves) ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.