Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brahm (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 10:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Brahm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's been a while since the last deletion but I think this qualifies as a WP:BLP1E situation. Anything usable is already at 4chan#Threats_of_violence. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Now that the skies have changed, I feel we should rethink this article's importance on Wiki. After all, it is little more than an extended 4chan#Threats_Of_violence section. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 14:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge into 4chan.--Blargh29 (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is merely a passing news item. BLP1E is definitely relevant. LadyofShalott 01:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Just merge it with 4chan.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 04:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Put anything that's not there yet and that's notable, into 4chan. The subject is solely notable for one event, he doesn't rate a wikipedia entry. And whatever you do: Don't mess with football. David in DC (talk) 07:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Making threats on an immature forum is not the kind of crime which has a lasting impact. Old news story. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.